Charity: water Close
emotional cities

Uncategorized: emotional cities

Artist, teacher and cultural activist Christian Nold is running Bio Mapping, an innovative community mapping project where participants walk around neighbourhoods, wired up to a device which works like a lie detector. It measures Galvanic Skin Response (GSR), and is a simple indicator of emotional arousal in relation to particular geographic locations. These responses are then compiled into communal emotion maps which show the areas that people feel strongly about, where they feel stressed or excited. These maps begin to reveal the social spaces of a community and explore the relationships between people and their social and built environments. This project has been carried out in several cities including London and San Francisco.

As an interesting conceptual art work, it appeals to all my curiosities about art, urban places, science and maps, but oh, the urban planner in me can’t help but think about the practical possibilities of this idea. There are certainly similar community consultation exercises already used to create the same sort of important social and cultural analysis. But I think many parts of the consultation and planning process get clouded by our own unavoidable thinking and assumptions about how people should response in urban spaces, and what makes a place good or bad etc. Maybe that’s why I like this bio mapping idea – because there seems to be something powerful truthful about measuring a response that can’t lie or be complicated by intellect.

 
  • http://www.josephmark.com.au Josh Capelin

    But Yen, how do you measure spaces before they exist? Or would the idea be to work out what works and what doesn’t and then implement. Very interesting concept.

  • http://www.tract.net.au Yen Trinh

    Yeah I’m thinking it as a pre-design tool. Finding out emotional responses and the elements (built form or otherwise) that contribute to those responses – could help define what does/doesn’t works, what is important, what the goals/objectives are. If a built project, it could also be used at the end of projects as an design evaluation tool.

    This is what community consultation and good planning process is meant to do anyway, but I saw this as an interesting additional tool
    For professionals it would be another helpful ‘reality check’ to help delivery better, appropriate solutions to communities. It also adds strong support for urban design outcomes/pedestrian experience.

    For communities it adds something engaging (rather then a talk-fest workshop) and takes out some of the thinking required of them (it would help geographically focus, and articulate many of the questions people get asked in consultaion like what they value and their main issues/concerns)

  • Pingback: next level festival at the map village street editors

  • Pingback: Mappiness « City Love